I don't consider myself an expert at this game by any means, but I have loved the series from the Civ III period to now. It might have just been a coincidence, but just giving you my experience from what I played. I found it curious that for an expansion that focuses so much on culture and diplomacy, putting cities this close to each other on large continents was a recipe for early and continual war. Starting locations in my 4 games were all odd, as each time I had 2 other capitals within 6-7 hexes of mine (with an ocean on one side in three of them). The AI is MUCH MORE aggressive at expansion though.
#BRAVE NEW WORLD CIV 5 DIFFERENCE HOW TO#
The AI doesn't seem improved as they still don't know how to defend a naval assault. If you're playing with Venice, you can have scores of trade routes at any one time, and it makes the game bog down even more than it already does in the later eras.īarbarians seem stronger.
There really needs to be an option to automatically renew the route.
I loved the new trade system but I think it needs tweaking a bit. Granted, you can gain puppet cities, but you can't control them (but you can purchase improvements in them oddly enough). Only having the ability to build one city is fun and forces you to change your strategy. I played through 4 games (Venice, Indonesia, France (since they changed them so much), and Poland), and Venice is a challenge for sure. What I was greatly impressed with in my 30 hours in the expansion (logged thousands of hours in vanilla Civ 5 and Gods and Kings) was the way they seamlessly improved the culture with tourism and made it and diplomacy viable options for victory.
0 kommentar(er)
